CANCERS BRONCHIQUES NON A PETITES CELLULES AU STADE AVANCE
ESSAIS TESTANT LE ROLE DU DOCETAXEL

Précédent Retour au menu principal  Suivant


référence

chimiothérapie

n

(stIV)

% RO

p

SM

p

Georgoulias,

2001 (1)

I. CDDP (80 mg/m²)+docetaxel (100 mg/m²)

205

(129)

35

 

NS

10 m

 

NS

II. Gemci + docetaxel (100 mg/m²)

201

(130)

33

9,5 m

Schiller,

2002 (2)

I.CDDP (75 mg/m²)+ paclitaxel (135 mg/m²)

303

89

21

 

 

 

NS

7,8 m

 

 

 

NS

II.CDDP 100 + gemcitabine

301

86

22

8,1 m

III.CDDP 75 + docetaxel (75 mg/m²)

304

86

17

7,4 m

IV.Carboplatine  (AUC 6) + paclitaxel (225)

299

86

17

8,1 m

Perol,

2002 (3)

I. docetaxel (100)~CDDP-VNR

38

tous

11

 

29 s

 

II. CDDP-VNR

32

25

43 s

Fossella,

2003 (4)

I. Docétaxel + CDDP (75)

408

67 %

32

 

 

S

11,3 m

 

 

0,044 *

II. Docétaxel + Carboplatine (AUC 6)

404

67 %

24

9,4 m

III. CDDP (100) + VNR

404

67 %

24,5

10,1 m

Kubota,

2004 (5)

I. Docétaxel (60) + CDDP (80)

151

tous

37%

S

11,3 m

0,014

II. VDS + CDDP (80)

151

21%

9,6 m

Rocha-Lima,

2004 (6)

I. gemcitabine + irinotecan

39

(30)

12,8 %

 

8 m

 

II. gemcitabine + docétaxel

39

(31)

23,1 %

 

12,8 m

 

Yamamoto,

2004 (7)

I. CDDP (80) + docetaxel (60)

51

(40)

37 %

NS

50 s

NS

II. Irinotecan + docetaxel (60)

57

(43)

32 %

46 s

Georgoulias,

2004 (8)

I. Docetaxel (100)

152

64%

15 %

0,004

8 m

0,2

II. Docetaxel  (100) + cisplatin (80 J2)

167

65%

36 %

10,5 m

Douillard,

2005 (9)

I. docétaxel (75) + cisplatine (100)

115

100%

34%

0,20

8m

NS

II. vinorelbine + cisplatine (100)

118

100%

26%

9m

Booton,

2006 (10;11)

I. docétaxel (75) + carboplatine (AUC 6)

217

48 %

32 %

NS

9.5 m

0.29

II. MMC + CDDP (50) + Ifo or VBL

216

53 %

32 %

8.7 m

Kudoh,

2006 (11)

I. Docetaxel (60)

69

63 %

23 %

0.02

14,3 m

0,065

II. Vinorelbine (> ou = 70 ans)

91

64 %

10 %

9,9 m

Park,

2007 (12)

I. CDDP (75) + docétaxel (35/sem)

44

(33)

39 %

NS

10 m

NS

II. CDDP (75) + docétaxel (75/ 3 sem)

42

(30)

40 %

10,3 m

Lilenbaum,

2007 (13)

I. Docétaxel 75 / 3 sem

55

85 %

9,1 %

NS

3,5 m

NS

II. Docétaxel 30 / sem

56

82 %

5,4 %

6,7 m

Leong,

2007 (14)

I. Gemcitabine 800/sem

43

(34)

16 %

NS

5,2 m

 

II. Vinorelbine 25/sem

45

(35)

20 %

6,8 m

III. Docétaxel  30/sem

46

(34)

22 %

5,1 m

Chen,

2007 (15)

I. CDDP (60) + docetaxel

46

80 %

44 %

NS

13 m

NS

II. CDDP (60) + vinorelbine

48

83 %

46 %

13,8 m

Georgoulias,

2008 (16)

I. Docétaxel (100)

155

77 %

12 %

S

8,3 m

0,037

II. Docétaxel (75) + gemcitabine

157

77 %

27 %

9,4 m

Hainsworth,

2007 (17)

I. Docétaxel (hebd)

171

73 %

17 %

0,1

5,1 m

0,65

II. Docétaxel + gemcitabine

174

76 %

25 %

5,5 m

Kim,

2012 (18)

I. Docétaxel 75 + cisplatine 60

65

59

43 %

NS

19,3 m

NS

I. Docétaxel 60 + cisplatine 60

67

60

44 %

13 ,6m

* comparaison ajustée




Références

(1) Georgoulias V, Papadakis E, Alexopoulos A, Tsiafaki X, Rapti A, Veslemes M et al. Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001; 357(9267):1478-1484.

(2) Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(2):92-98.

(3) Perol M, Lena H, Thomas P, Robinet G, Fournel P, Coste E et al. Phase II randomized multicenter study evaluating a treatment regimen alternating docetaxel and cisplatin-vinorelbine with a cisplatin-vinorelbine control group in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: GFPC 97.01 study. Ann Oncol 2002; 13(5):742-747.

(4) Fossella F, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Pluzanska A, Gorbounova V, Kaukel E et al. Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TAX 326 study group. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(16):3016-3024.

(5) Kubota K, Watanabe K, Kunitoh H, Noda K, Ichinose Y, Katakami N et al. Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel plus cisplatin versus vindesine plus cisplatin in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: the Japanese Taxotere Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(2):254-261

(6) Rocha Lima CM, Rizvi NA, Zhang C, Herndon JE, Crawford J, Govindan R et al. Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine plus irinotecan or docetaxel in stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC. Ann Oncol 2004; 15(3):410-418.

(7) Yamamoto N, Fukuoka M, Negoro SI, Nakagawa K, Saito H, Matsui K et al. Randomised phase II study of docetaxel/cisplatin vs docetaxel/irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Study (WJTOG9803). Br J Cancer 2004; 90(1):87-92.

(8) Georgoulias V, Ardavanis A, Agelidou A, Agelidou M, Chandrinos V, Tsaroucha E et al. Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(13):2602-2609.

(9) Douillard JY, Gervais R, Dabouis G, Le Groumellec A, D'Arlhac M, Spaeth D et al. Sequential two-line strategy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: docetaxel-cisplatin versus vinorelbine-cisplatin followed by cross-over to single-agent docetaxel or vinorelbine at progression: final results of a randomised phase II study. Ann Oncol 2005; 16(1):81-89.

(10) Booton R, Lorigan P, Anderson H, Baka S, Ashcroft L, Nicolson M et al. A phase III trial of docetaxel/carboplatin versus mitomycin C/ifosfamide/cisplatin (MIC) or mitomycin C/vinblastine/cisplatin (MVP) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial of the British Thoracic Oncology Group (BTOG1). Ann Oncol 2006; 17(7):1111-1119.

(11) Kudoh S, Takeda K, Nakagawa K, Takada M, Katakami N, Matsui K et al. Phase III study of docetaxel compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG 9904). J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(22):3657-3663.

12) Park SH, Choi SJ, Kyung SY, An CH, Lee SP, Park JW, et al. Randomized phase II trial of two different schedules of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 2007 Feb 15;109(4):732-40.

(13) Lilenbaum R, Rubin M, Samuel J, Boros L, Chidiac T, Seigel L, et al. A randomized phase II trial of two schedules of docetaxel in elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2007 Apr;2(4):306-11.

(14) Leong SS, Toh CK, Lim WT, Lin X, Tan SB, Poon D, et al. A randomized phase II trial of single-agent gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who have poor performance status and/or are elderly. J Thorac Oncol 2007 Mar;2(3):230-6.

(15) Chen YM, Perng RP, Shih JF, Tsai CM, Whang-Peng J. A randomized phase II study of docetaxel or vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin against inoperable, chemo-naive non-small-cell lung cancer in Taiwan. Lung Cancer 2007 Jun;56(3):363-9.

(16) Georgoulias V, Androulakis N, Kotsakis A, Hatzidaki D, Syrigos K, Polyzos A, et al. Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial. Lung Cancer 2008 Jan;59(1):57-63.

(17) Hainsworth JD, Spigel DR, Farley C, Shipley DL, Bearden JD, Gandhi J, et al. Weekly docetaxel versus docetaxel/gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. Cancer 2007 Nov 1;110(9):2027-34.

(18) Kim KS, Oh IJ, Ban HJ, Cho HJ, Kwon YS, Kim YI, et al. Comparison of docetaxel/cisplatin dosages of 75/60 and 60/60 mg/m(2) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Exp Ther Med 2012 Aug;4(2):317-22.



Retour au début de la page