|
CANCERS BRONCHIQUES NON A PETITES CELLULES AU STADE AVANCE ESSAIS TESTANT LE ROLE DU DOCETAXEL
|
|
référence
|
chimiothérapie
|
n
|
(stIV)
|
% RO
|
p
|
SM
|
p
|
Georgoulias,
2001 (1)
|
I.
CDDP (80 mg/m²)+docetaxel (100 mg/m²)
|
205
|
(129)
|
35
|
NS
|
10 m
|
NS
|
II.
Gemci + docetaxel (100 mg/m²)
|
201
|
(130)
|
33
|
9,5 m
|
Schiller,
2002 (2)
|
I.CDDP (75 mg/m²)+
paclitaxel (135 mg/m²)
|
303
|
89
|
21
|
NS
|
7,8 m
|
NS
|
II.CDDP 100 +
gemcitabine
|
301
|
86
|
22
|
8,1 m
|
III.CDDP 75 + docetaxel
(75 mg/m²)
|
304
|
86
|
17
|
7,4 m
|
IV.Carboplatine (AUC 6) + paclitaxel (225)
|
299
|
86
|
17
|
8,1 m
|
Perol,
2002 (3)
|
I. docetaxel
(100)~CDDP-VNR
|
38
|
tous
|
11
|
|
29
s
|
|
II. CDDP-VNR
|
32
|
25
|
43
s
|
Fossella,
2003 (4)
|
I. Docétaxel + CDDP (75)
|
408
|
67
%
|
32
|
S
|
11,3 m
|
0,044
*
|
II. Docétaxel +
Carboplatine (AUC 6)
|
404
|
67
%
|
24
|
9,4 m
|
III. CDDP (100) + VNR
|
404
|
67
%
|
24,5
|
10,1 m
|
Kubota,
2004 (5)
|
I. Docétaxel (60) + CDDP
(80)
|
151
|
tous
|
37%
|
S
|
11,3 m
|
0,014
|
II. VDS + CDDP (80)
|
151
|
21%
|
9,6 m
|
Rocha-Lima,
2004 (6)
|
I.
gemcitabine + irinotecan
|
39
|
(30)
|
12,8 %
|
|
8
m
|
|
II.
gemcitabine + docétaxel
|
39
|
(31)
|
23,1 %
|
|
12,8 m
|
|
Yamamoto,
2004 (7)
|
|
51
|
(40)
|
37
%
|
NS
|
50
s
|
NS
|
II.
Irinotecan + docetaxel (60)
|
57
|
(43)
|
32
%
|
46
s
|
Georgoulias,
2004 (8)
|
I.
Docetaxel (100)
|
152
|
64%
|
15
%
|
0,004
|
8 m
|
0,2
|
II.
Docetaxel (100) + cisplatin (80 J2)
|
167
|
65%
|
36
%
|
10,5 m
|
Douillard,
2005 (9)
|
I.
docétaxel (75) + cisplatine (100)
|
115
|
100%
|
34%
|
0,20
|
8m
|
NS
|
II.
vinorelbine + cisplatine (100)
|
118
|
100%
|
26%
|
9m
|
Booton,
2006 (10;11)
|
I.
docétaxel (75) + carboplatine (AUC 6)
|
217
|
48 %
|
32
%
|
NS
|
9.5 m
|
0.29
|
II.
MMC + CDDP (50) + Ifo or VBL
|
216
|
53
%
|
32
%
|
8.7 m
|
Kudoh,
2006 (11)
|
I. Docetaxel (60)
|
69
|
63 %
|
23 %
|
0.02
|
14,3
m
|
0,065
|
II.
Vinorelbine (> ou = 70 ans)
|
91
|
64 %
|
10 %
|
9,9
m
|
Park,
2007 (12)
|
I.
CDDP (75) + docétaxel (35/sem)
|
44
|
(33)
|
39 %
|
NS
|
10
m
|
NS
|
II.
CDDP (75) + docétaxel (75/ 3 sem)
|
42
|
(30)
|
40 %
|
10,3
m
|
Lilenbaum,
2007 (13)
|
I.
Docétaxel 75 / 3 sem
|
55
|
85 %
|
9,1 %
|
NS
|
3,5
m
|
NS
|
II.
Docétaxel 30 / sem
|
56
|
82 %
|
5,4 %
|
6,7
m
|
Leong,
2007 (14)
|
I.
Gemcitabine 800/sem
|
43
|
(34)
|
16 %
|
NS
|
5,2
m
|
|
II.
Vinorelbine 25/sem
|
45
|
(35)
|
20 %
|
6,8
m
|
III.
Docétaxel 30/sem
|
46
|
(34)
|
22 %
|
5,1
m
|
Chen,
2007 (15)
|
I.
CDDP (60) + docetaxel
|
46
|
80 %
|
44 %
|
NS
|
13
m
|
NS
|
II.
CDDP (60) + vinorelbine
|
48
|
83 %
|
46 %
|
13,8
m
|
Georgoulias,
2008 (16)
|
I.
Docétaxel (100)
|
155
|
77 %
|
12 %
|
S
|
8,3
m
|
0,037
|
II.
Docétaxel (75) + gemcitabine
|
157
|
77 %
|
27 %
|
9,4
m
|
Hainsworth,
2007 (17)
|
I.
Docétaxel (hebd)
|
171
|
73 %
|
17 %
|
0,1
|
5,1
m
|
0,65
|
II.
Docétaxel + gemcitabine
|
174
|
76 %
|
25 %
|
5,5
m
|
Kim,
2012 (18)
|
I.
Docétaxel 75 + cisplatine 60
|
65
|
59
|
43 %
|
NS
|
19,3
m
|
NS
|
I.
Docétaxel 60 + cisplatine 60
|
67
|
60
|
44 %
|
13 ,6m
|
* comparaison ajustée
Références
(1) Georgoulias V, Papadakis E, Alexopoulos A, Tsiafaki X, Rapti A, Veslemes M et al. Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001; 357(9267):1478-1484.
(2) Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(2):92-98.
(3) Perol M, Lena H, Thomas P, Robinet G, Fournel P, Coste E et al. Phase II randomized multicenter study evaluating a treatment regimen alternating docetaxel and cisplatin-vinorelbine with a cisplatin-vinorelbine control group in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: GFPC 97.01 study. Ann Oncol 2002; 13(5):742-747.
(4) Fossella F, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Pluzanska A, Gorbounova V, Kaukel E et al. Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TAX 326 study group. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(16):3016-3024.
(5) Kubota K, Watanabe K, Kunitoh H, Noda K, Ichinose Y, Katakami N et al. Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel plus cisplatin versus vindesine plus cisplatin in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: the Japanese Taxotere Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(2):254-261
(6) Rocha Lima CM, Rizvi NA, Zhang C, Herndon JE, Crawford J, Govindan R et al. Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine plus irinotecan or docetaxel in stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC. Ann Oncol 2004; 15(3):410-418.
(7) Yamamoto N, Fukuoka M, Negoro SI, Nakagawa K, Saito H, Matsui K et al. Randomised phase II study of docetaxel/cisplatin vs docetaxel/irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Study (WJTOG9803). Br J Cancer 2004; 90(1):87-92.
(8) Georgoulias V, Ardavanis A, Agelidou A, Agelidou M, Chandrinos V, Tsaroucha E et al. Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(13):2602-2609.
(9) Douillard JY, Gervais R, Dabouis G, Le Groumellec A, D'Arlhac M, Spaeth D et al. Sequential two-line strategy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: docetaxel-cisplatin versus vinorelbine-cisplatin followed by cross-over to single-agent docetaxel or vinorelbine at progression: final results of a randomised phase II study. Ann Oncol 2005; 16(1):81-89.
(10) Booton R, Lorigan P, Anderson H, Baka S, Ashcroft L, Nicolson M et al. A phase III trial of docetaxel/carboplatin versus mitomycin C/ifosfamide/cisplatin (MIC) or mitomycin C/vinblastine/cisplatin (MVP) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial of the British Thoracic Oncology Group (BTOG1). Ann Oncol 2006; 17(7):1111-1119.
(11) Kudoh S, Takeda K, Nakagawa K, Takada M, Katakami N, Matsui K et al. Phase III study of docetaxel compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG 9904). J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(22):3657-3663.
12) Park SH, Choi SJ, Kyung SY, An CH, Lee SP, Park JW, et al. Randomized phase II trial of two different schedules of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 2007 Feb 15;109(4):732-40.
(13) Lilenbaum R, Rubin M, Samuel J, Boros L, Chidiac T, Seigel L, et al. A randomized phase II trial of two schedules of docetaxel in elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2007 Apr;2(4):306-11.
(14) Leong SS, Toh CK, Lim WT, Lin X, Tan SB, Poon D, et al. A randomized phase II trial of single-agent gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who have poor performance status and/or are elderly. J Thorac Oncol 2007 Mar;2(3):230-6.
(15) Chen YM, Perng RP, Shih JF, Tsai CM, Whang-Peng J. A randomized phase II study of docetaxel or vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin against inoperable, chemo-naive non-small-cell lung cancer in Taiwan. Lung Cancer 2007 Jun;56(3):363-9.
(16) Georgoulias V, Androulakis N, Kotsakis A, Hatzidaki D, Syrigos K, Polyzos A, et al. Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial. Lung Cancer 2008 Jan;59(1):57-63.
(17) Hainsworth JD, Spigel DR, Farley C, Shipley DL, Bearden JD, Gandhi J, et al. Weekly docetaxel versus docetaxel/gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. Cancer 2007 Nov 1;110(9):2027-34.
(18) Kim KS, Oh IJ, Ban HJ, Cho HJ, Kwon YS, Kim YI, et al. Comparison of docetaxel/cisplatin dosages of 75/60 and 60/60 mg/m(2) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Exp Ther Med 2012 Aug;4(2):317-22.
|