CANCERS BRONCHIQUES NON A PETITES CELLULES AU STADE AVANCE
ESSAIS TESTANT LE ROLE DE L’ETOPOSIDE, DE LA VINDESINE, DE LA VINBLASTINE ET DE LA VINORELBINE AU SEIN D’UNE ASSOCIATION DE CHIMIOTHERAPIE A BASE DE CISPLATINE


Précédent Retour au menu principal  Suivant


<

Référence

mg/m² CDDP VP16 VDS     VBL  VNR 

n

(stIV)

%RO

p

SM

p

Dhingra,

1985 (1)

 

 

I.          120           -              +              -              -

II.   60-80             +              -              -              -

III.  50-80             +             +              -              -

 

62

67

62

 

(54)

(57)

(52)

 

35

30

22

 

NS

 

29 s.

29 s.

28 s.

 

NS

 

Kris,

1985 (2)

 

I.         120            -              +              -              -

II.        120            -              -              +             -

48

49

 

(43)

(41)

 

33

41

 

NS

 

8,5 m.

12,3 m.

NS

 

 

Ruckdeschel,

1986 (3)

I.         120            -              +              -              -

II.        120            +              -              -              -

 

126

124

 

(126)

(124)

 

25

20

 

NS

 

26,0 s.

26,6 s.

NS

Paccagnella,

1986 (4)

I.         100            -              +              -              -

II.        100            +              -              -              -

35

38

 

(5)

(7)

 

48

36

 

NS

43 s.

47 s.

 

NS

 

Hainsworth,

1989 (5)

I.          60             -              +              -              -

II.         60             +              -              -              -

III.       60             +             +              -             

 

52

49

51

 

(36)

(40)

(42)

 

10

6

24

 

S

 

24,5 s.

16,5 s.

20 s.

 

0,08

 

Niiranen,

1990 (6)

I.          90             -              +              -              -

II.         90             +              -              -              -

 

72

64

 

(?)

(?)

35

16

 

0,06

181 j.

166 j.

NS

 

Weick,

1991 (7)

I.         100            +              -              -              -

II.        100            -              -              +             -

 

135

142

 

(135)

(142)

16

24

 

S

 

5,3 m.

5,9 m.

 

NS

 

Le Chevalier,

1994 (8)

I.         120            -              -              -             +

II.        120            -              +              -              -

206

200

(102)

(109)

30

19

0,02

40 s.

32 s.

 

0,08

 

Crino,

1995 (9)

I.         120            +              -              -              -
II.        120            -              +              -        - (1)
III.      120            -              -              -         -(2)

130
130
135

(76)
(75)
(77)

23
36
40

0,01

27 s.
42 s.
36 s.

0,04

Kosmidis,

1996 (10)

I.       100           -           -              +          -  

II.      100          +           -               -          -

 

106

106

 

(70)

(62)

 

29

25

 

NS

 

8,5 m

9,4 m

NS

 

Pérol,

1996 (11)

I.         120            -              -              -             +

II.        120            -              +              -              -

114

113

 

25

17

NS

35 s

33 s

NS

Jeremic,

1999 (12)

I.        Carbo      po            -             -        -

II.      Carbo      iv              -            -         -

84

84

tous

23

19

 

NS

8 m

7 m

 

NS

Jassem,

2001 (13)

I.         -              -            -             -          po

II.        -              -            -             -          iv    

77

38

 

14

12

 

9,3 m

7,9 m

 

Tan,

2009 (14)  I

I. Cisplatine  (80) + vinorelbine iv/peros

190

80 %

27

NS

9,9 m

NS

II. Cisplatine (75) + docétaxel

191

85 %

27

9,8 m



Références

(1) Dhingra HM, Valdivieso M, Carr DT, Chiuten DF, Farha P, Murphy WK et al. Randomized trial of three combinations of cisplatin with vindesine and/or VP-16-213 in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3(2):176-183.

(2) Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Kalman LA, Kelsen DP, Casper ES, Burke MT et al. Randomized trial comparing vindesine plus cisplatin with vinblastine plus cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with an analysis of methods of response assessment. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69(4):387-395.

(3) Ruckdeschel JC, Finkelstein DM, Ettinger DS, Creech RH, Mason BA, Joss RA et al. A randomized trial of the four most active regimens for metastatic non- small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4(1):14-22.

(4) Paccagnella A, Brandes A, Pappagallo GL, Simioni G, Fosser VP, Vinante O et al. Cisplatin plus vindesine versus cisplatin plus VP16 versus doxorubicin plus cytoxan in non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. A randomized study. Tumori 1986; 72(4):417-425.

(5) Hainsworth JD, Johnson DH, Hande KR, Greco FA. Chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial of three cis-platin-based chemotherapy regimens. Am J Clin Oncol 1989; 12(4):345-349.

(6) Niiranen A, Niitamo-Korhonen S, Holsti P., Holsti LR. A randomized comparison of cisplatin-vindesine and cisplatin-etoposide for the treatment of previously untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Journal 1990; 3:219-223.

(7) Weick JK, Crowley J, Natale RB, Hom BL, Rivkin S, Coltman CAJ et al. A randomized trial of five cisplatin-containing treatments in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9(7):1157-1162.

(8) Le Chevalier T, Pujol JL, Douillard JY, Alberola V, Monnier A, Riviere A et al. A three-arm trial of vinorelbine (Navelbine) plus cisplatin, vindesine plus cisplatin, and single-agent vinorelbine in the treatment of non- small cell lung cancer: an expanded analysis. Semin Oncol 1994; 21(5 Suppl 10):28-33.

(9) Crino L, Clerici M, Figoli F, Carlini P, Ceci G, Cortesi E et al. Chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison of three active regimens. A randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (G.O.I.R.C.). Ann Oncol 1995; 6(4):347-353.

(10) Kosmidis P, Mylonakis N, Fountzilas G, Pavlidis N, Samantas E, Karabelis A et al. A prospective randomized phase III study in non-small-cell lung cancer comparing cisplatin, ifosfamide, vinblastine (VIP) versus cisplatin, ifosfamide and etoposide (VIP-16). Hellenic Co-Operative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol 1996; 7(5):517-520.

(11) Perol M, Guerin JC, Thomas P, Poirier R, Carles P, Robinet G et al. Multicenter randomized trial comparing cisplatin-mitomycin-vinorelbine versus cisplatin-mitomycin-vindesine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 'Groupe Francais de Pneumo-Cancerologie'. Lung Cancer 1996; 14(1):119-134.

(12) Jeremic B, Shibamoto Y, Milicic B, Milisavljevic S, Nikolic N, Dagovic A et al. Prolonged oral versus high-dose intravenous etoposide in combination with carboplatin for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a randomized trial. Lung Cancer 1999; 25(3):207-214.

(13) Jassem J, Ramlau R, Karnicka-Mlodkowska H, Krawczyk K, Krzakowski M, Zatloukal P et al. A multicenter randomized phase II study of oral vs. intravenous vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2001; 12(10):1375-1381.

(14) Tan EH, Rolski J, Grodzki T, Schneider CP, Gatzemeier U, Zatloukal P, et al. Global Lung Oncology Branch trial 3 (GLOB3): final results of a randomised multinational phase III study alternating oral and i.v. vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2009 Jul;20(7):1249-56.



Retour au début de la page