|
CANCERS BRONCHIQUES NON A PETITES CELLULES AU STADE AVANCE ESSAIS TESTANT LE ROLE DE L’ETOPOSIDE, DE LA VINDESINE, DE LA VINBLASTINE ET DE LA VINORELBINE AU SEIN D’UNE ASSOCIATION DE CHIMIOTHERAPIE A BASE DE CISPLATINE
|
|
<
Référence
|
mg/m² CDDP VP16 VDS VBL
VNR
|
n
|
(stIV)
|
%RO
|
p
|
SM
|
p
|
Dhingra,
1985
(1)
|
I.
120 - + - -
II. 60-80 + - - -
III. 50-80 + + - -
|
62
67
62
|
(54)
(57)
(52)
|
35
30
22
|
NS
|
29 s.
29 s.
28 s.
|
NS
|
Kris,
1985
(2)
|
I. 120 - + - -
II. 120 - - + -
|
48
49
|
(43)
(41)
|
33
41
|
NS
|
8,5 m.
12,3 m.
|
NS
|
Ruckdeschel,
1986
(3)
|
I. 120 - + - -
II. 120 + - - -
|
126
124
|
(126)
(124)
|
25
20
|
NS
|
26,0 s.
26,6 s.
|
NS
|
Paccagnella,
1986
(4)
|
I. 100 - + - -
II. 100 + - - -
|
35
38
|
(5)
(7)
|
48
36
|
NS
|
43 s.
47 s.
|
NS
|
Hainsworth,
1989
(5)
|
I. 60 - + - -
II. 60 + - - -
III. 60 + + - -
|
52
49
51
|
(36)
(40)
(42)
|
10
6
24
|
S
|
24,5 s.
16,5 s.
20 s.
|
0,08
|
Niiranen,
1990
(6)
|
I. 90 - + - -
II. 90 + - - -
|
72
64
|
(?)
(?)
|
35
16
|
0,06
|
181 j.
166
j.
|
NS
|
Weick,
1991
(7)
|
I. 100 + - - -
II. 100 - - + -
|
135
142
|
(135)
(142)
|
16
24
|
S
|
5,3
m.
5,9
m.
|
NS
|
Le
Chevalier,
1994
(8)
|
I.
120 - - - +
II. 120 - + - -
|
206
200
|
(102)
(109)
|
30
19
|
0,02
|
40
s.
32
s.
|
0,08
|
Crino,
1995
(9)
|
I. 120 + - - -
II. 120 - + - - (1)
III. 120 - - - -(2)
|
130
130
135
|
(76)
(75)
(77)
|
23
36
40
|
0,01
|
27
s.
42 s.
36 s.
|
0,04
|
Kosmidis,
1996
(10)
|
I. 100 -
- +
-
II. 100
+
- -
-
|
106
106
|
(70)
(62)
|
29
25
|
NS
|
8,5
m
9,4
m
|
NS
|
Pérol,
1996
(11)
|
I.
120 - - - +
II. 120 - + - -
|
114
113
|
|
25
17
|
NS
|
35
s
33
s
|
NS
|
Jeremic,
1999
(12)
|
I. Carbo po - - -
II. Carbo iv - - -
|
84
84
|
tous
|
23
19
|
NS
|
8
m
7
m
|
NS
|
Jassem,
2001
(13)
|
I. - - - - po
II. - - - - iv
|
77
38
|
|
14
12
|
|
9,3
m
7,9
m
|
|
Tan,
2009
(14) I
|
I.
Cisplatine (80) + vinorelbine iv/peros
|
190
|
80
%
|
27
|
NS
|
9,9 m
|
NS
|
II.
Cisplatine (75) + docétaxel
|
191
|
85
%
|
27
|
9,8 m
|
Références
(1) Dhingra HM, Valdivieso M, Carr DT, Chiuten DF, Farha P, Murphy WK et al. Randomized trial of three combinations of cisplatin with vindesine and/or VP-16-213 in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3(2):176-183.
(2) Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Kalman LA, Kelsen DP, Casper ES, Burke MT et al. Randomized trial comparing vindesine plus cisplatin with vinblastine plus cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with an analysis of methods of response assessment. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69(4):387-395.
(3) Ruckdeschel JC, Finkelstein DM, Ettinger DS, Creech RH, Mason BA, Joss RA et al. A randomized trial of the four most active regimens for metastatic non- small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4(1):14-22.
(4) Paccagnella A, Brandes A, Pappagallo GL, Simioni G, Fosser VP, Vinante O et al. Cisplatin plus vindesine versus cisplatin plus VP16 versus doxorubicin plus cytoxan in non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. A randomized study. Tumori 1986; 72(4):417-425.
(5) Hainsworth JD, Johnson DH, Hande KR, Greco FA. Chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial of three cis-platin-based chemotherapy regimens. Am J Clin Oncol 1989; 12(4):345-349.
(6) Niiranen A, Niitamo-Korhonen S, Holsti P., Holsti LR. A randomized comparison of cisplatin-vindesine and cisplatin-etoposide for the treatment of previously untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Journal 1990; 3:219-223.
(7) Weick JK, Crowley J, Natale RB, Hom BL, Rivkin S, Coltman CAJ et al. A randomized trial of five cisplatin-containing treatments in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9(7):1157-1162.
(8) Le Chevalier T, Pujol JL, Douillard JY, Alberola V, Monnier A, Riviere A et al. A three-arm trial of vinorelbine (Navelbine) plus cisplatin, vindesine plus cisplatin, and single-agent vinorelbine in the treatment of non- small cell lung cancer: an expanded analysis. Semin Oncol 1994; 21(5 Suppl 10):28-33.
(9) Crino L, Clerici M, Figoli F, Carlini P, Ceci G, Cortesi E et al. Chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison of three active regimens. A randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (G.O.I.R.C.). Ann Oncol 1995; 6(4):347-353.
(10) Kosmidis P, Mylonakis N, Fountzilas G, Pavlidis N, Samantas E, Karabelis A et al. A prospective randomized phase III study in non-small-cell lung cancer comparing cisplatin, ifosfamide, vinblastine (VIP) versus cisplatin, ifosfamide and etoposide (VIP-16). Hellenic Co-Operative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol 1996; 7(5):517-520.
(11) Perol M, Guerin JC, Thomas P, Poirier R, Carles P, Robinet G et al. Multicenter randomized trial comparing cisplatin-mitomycin-vinorelbine versus cisplatin-mitomycin-vindesine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 'Groupe Francais de Pneumo-Cancerologie'. Lung Cancer 1996; 14(1):119-134.
(12) Jeremic B, Shibamoto Y, Milicic B, Milisavljevic S, Nikolic N, Dagovic A et al. Prolonged oral versus high-dose intravenous etoposide in combination with carboplatin for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a randomized trial. Lung Cancer 1999; 25(3):207-214.
(13) Jassem J, Ramlau R, Karnicka-Mlodkowska H, Krawczyk K, Krzakowski M, Zatloukal P et al. A multicenter randomized phase II study of oral vs. intravenous vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2001; 12(10):1375-1381.
(14) Tan EH, Rolski J, Grodzki T, Schneider CP, Gatzemeier U, Zatloukal P, et al. Global Lung Oncology Branch trial 3 (GLOB3): final results of a randomised multinational phase III study alternating oral and i.v. vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2009 Jul;20(7):1249-56.
|